Onco'Zine - Today

Latest Videos - Onco'Zine

The Lancet Oncology

Showing posts with label PET. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PET. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

A New and Advanced Imaging Technique Allows Researchers to Monitor Protein Changes in Mouse Tumors

A new imaging technique can monitor, in living mice, the HER2 protein found in above-normal amounts in many cases of breast cancer as well as some ovarian, prostate and lung cancers. This new approach, once validated in mice and pending further experiments, could provide a real-time noninvasive method for identifying tumors in women who express HER2 and who would be candidates for targeted therapy directed against this protein.

The new technique may also provide real-time information that will help clinicians optimize treatment for individual patients. The study by Kramer-Marek and colleagues, published in the July 2009 issue of The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, was conducted at the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, both parts of the National Institutes of Health.

Overexpression of HER2
The HER2 protein is overexpressed in approximately 20 percent to 25 percent of breast cancers. Numerous studies have shown that HER2 is associated with shorter disease-free and overall survival. In breast cancer, HER2 gene amplification was significantly associated with pathologic stage at diagnosis, axillary node involvement, and histologic subtype. In ovarian cancer HER2 has been associated with decreased overall survival and with an increase in relative risk of death.

Tumors that overexpress HER2 are more aggressive and more likely to recur than tumors that do not overexpress the protein. Targeted therapies directed against HER2 can slow or stop the growth of tumors that overexpress it.

Determining HER2
HER2 expression can be determined by any of several methods. The most commonly used methods include Fluorescence in situ hybridization or FISH, which detects gene amplification by measuring the number of copies of the HER2 gene in the nuclei of tumor cells and Immunohistochemistry or IHC, which measures the number of HER2 receptors on the cell surface and therefore detects receptor overexpression.

Chromogenic in situ hybridization or CISH, which measures gene amplification using a light microscope rather than a fluorescent microscope required for FISH and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction or RT-PCR, which detects HER2 gene amplification are among some other methods of HER2 testing whicj have been used increasingly in clinical studies and may eventually be incorporated into routine practice.

Not Perfect
In 2007, Wolff et al showed that Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test results can be affected by testing conditions including the use of suboptimally fixed tissue, failure to use specified reagents, deviation from specific instructions, and failure to include appropriate controls. Therefore, in order to increase the accuracy of HER2 testing results, testing should be performed by laboratories with demonstrated aptitude in the specific test requested. Even if tested in these high-end laboratories, expression of HER2 in test samples may still not accurately represent HER2 expression in the tumor as a whole. Moreover, follow-up biopsies are not always routinely performed after the initial diagnosis, and there are no means to evaluate how long a targeted therapy takes to reach its target, how effective it is, and how long its effects last.

In this study, the researchers used an imaging compound that consists of a radioactive atom (fluorine-18) attached to an Affibody molecule, a small protein that binds strongly and specifically to HER2. Affibody molecules are developed by Affibody AB, (Bromma, Sweden), a Swedish biotech company focused on developing next generation products for therapy, diagnostic imaging, and other applications based on its unique proprietary Affibody® molecules and albumin binding technology platforms. The Affibody molecules are much smaller than antibodies and can reach the surface of tumors more easily. The radioactive atom allows the distribution of the Affibody molecules in the body to be analyzed by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging.

The researchers first used the radiolabeled Affibody molecule to visualize tumors that expressed HER2 in mice. The mice were injected under the skin with human breast cancer cells that varied in their levels of HER2 expression, from no expression to very high expression. After three to five weeks, when tumors had formed, the mice were injected with the Affibody molecule and PET images were recorded. The levels of HER2 expression as determined by PET were consistent with the levels measured in surgically removed samples of the same tumors using established laboratory techniques.

To determine whether their method could be used to monitor possible changes in HER2 expression in response to treatment, the team next injected the Affibody molecule into mice with tumors that expressed very high or high levels of HER2 and then treated them with the drug 17-DMAG, which is known to decrease HER2 expression. PET scans were performed before and after 17-DMAG treatment. The researchers found that HER2 levels were reduced by 71 percent in mice with tumors that expressed very high levels of HER2 and by 33 percent in mice with tumors that expressed high levels of HER2 in comparison with mice that did not receive 17-DMAG. The researchers confirmed these reductions by using established laboratory techniques to determine the concentrations of HER2 in the tumors after they were removed from the mice.

"Our work shows that PET imaging using Affibody molecules was sufficiently sensitive to detect a twofold to threefold decrease in HER2 expression," said senior author Jacek Capala, Ph.D., of NCI’s Center for Cancer Research. "Therefore, PET imaging may provide a considerable advantage over current methods. Our technique would allow a better selection of patients for HER2-targeted therapies and also early detection of tumors that either do not respond to or acquire resistance to these therapies."

"This approach might easily be extended to forms of cancer other than breast cancer," Capala continued. "Because Affibody molecules may be selected to target specific cell proteins, similar compounds can be developed to target proteins that are unique to other types of tumors."

For more information:

Also read PubMed Abstracts:

More information:

  • View an animation of how Affibody® molecules will enable cancer specialists to locate and treat tumors and metastases!

Images courtesy of Affibody AB.


Escalated Dose-Intensified Combined Modality Treatment Shows Survival Benefit In Patients With Early Unfavourable Hodgekin Lymphoma

With more than 7,500 participants from more than 100 European and non-European countries in attendance, the 14th congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA), which was held in Berlin, Germany, from June 4 – 7, 2009, proved record-breaking. The delegates gathered in Berlin to share the most recent developments in hematological research and improvements in care.

The program included sessions on clinical and laboratory hematology and covered all the major hematological subspecialties, including hemato-oncology, red cell disorders, hemostasis, thrombosis, pediatric hematology and transfusion medicine.

The program featured a session, presented by Prof. Peter Borchmann on behalf of the German Hodgkin Study Group / GHSG (abstract number 0553) discussing an analysis of Dose-Intensified Combined Modality Treatment In Patients With Early Unfavourable Hodgekin Lymphoma (HL).

As a result of intensified medical research, Hodgkin's lymphoma has become one of the most curable tumors in adults. Today, about 80% - 90% of patients experience long-term disease free survival (DFS). This is mainly the result of numerous large clinical trials initiated by the German Hodgkin Study Group and other organizations, taking place since the late 1970's, using risk-adapted, highly effective therapy modalities. From the late '70s nearly 15,000 patients have been randomized and treated in these prospectively randomized trials.

Risk Groups
Patients with Hodgkin lymphoma are divided in three risk groups according to the initial staging and additional clinical risk factors: early favorable, early unfavorable and advanced-stage risk groups.

Abstract 0553 (Interim Analysis of the GHSG HD14 Trial for Patients With Early Unfavourable HL) compared the results of the arms of the GHSG HD14 trial. The rational of this trial was to improve the prognosis of patients with early unfavorable disease by comparing the old standard treatment, 4 courses of ABVD (adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbacine) followed by localized radiotherapy (30 Gy IF-RT), with a more intensive chemotherapy regimen consisting of 2 cycles of escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone) followed by 2 cycles of ABVD and the same radiotherapy as in the standard arm.

Treatment-associated toxicities
A previous GHSG trial (GHSG HD11) compared 4 cycles of ABVD with BEACOPP, followed by either 30 or 20 Gy IF-RT. This trial showed no difference with respect to outcomes, and despite excellent initial remission rates, approximately 15% of patients with early unfavorable-stage HL relapsed within 5 years and another 5% suffered from progressive disease. Nevertheless, these good results of the GHSG trials are threatened by treatment-associated toxicities such as infertility, cardiopulmonary toxicity and secondary malignancies.

Improving trial results
The GHSG HD14 trial showed a significantly better outcome in terms of progression-free survival in the more intensive escalated BEACOPP regimen than the standard regimen of 4 cycles of ABVD in patients with early unfavorable Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL).
The study, conducted by the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), included 1645 patients in 346 centres. These patients had early unfavorable Hodgkin's lymphoma, clinical stage 1 or 2 and risk factors, including large mediastinal mass, extranodal disease, high erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and 3 or more areas affected.

Interim analysis
After the third interim analysis with 1127 patients, researchers decided to terminate the GHSD HD14 trial early because of the significantly better outcome for patients treated with BEACOPP compared to ABVD. The interim results showed that progression free survival (PFS) was significantly better for patients treated with the hybrid regimen than for patients treated with 4 courses of ABVD. After 3 years, progression-free survival was observed in 97% of patients in the escalated BEACOPP group and 91% in the ABVD group.

Furthermore, the interim analysis showed freedom from treatment failure to be 95% in the escalated BEACOPP group versus 91% in the ABVD group. Overall, there were more patients with progressive disease, relapse and a higher mortality in those receiving 4 cycles of ABVD. These results prompted the GHSG to adopt a regimen of two cycles of escalated BEACOPP followed by two cycles of ABVD plus 30 Gy radiotherapy as the new standard treatment for patients with early unfavorable Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Escalated BEACOPP, compared to standard BEACOPP, uses a higher doses of etoposide (200 vs 100 mg/m2), doxorubicin (35 vs 25 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (1200 vs 650 mg/m2), with added granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support. Combined with local irradiation, the escalated regimen showed superior disease control compared with ABVD. Patients experienced more hematological adverse events in the escalated BEACOPP group compared to the ABVD group. This included leukopenia (22% vs , including 81%), thrombocytopenia (<1%>

Predisposition to Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
An unrelated presentation by Prof. Nick Cross, Salisbury, United Kingdom, discussed research aimed to understand what causes a group of related conditions known collectively as myeloproliferative neoplasms (abstract number 0555).

Researchers have found a common genetic 'signature' that predisposes to these disorders. The predisposition is relatively subtle and so it cannot by itself be used to predict whether anyone will develop disease or not, but it is an important step towards understanding why some people get cancer and why others do not. In the future it is possible that the abnormality we have found might be combined with other genetic and environmental risk factors to enable much better predictions of disease susceptibility to be made.

Myeloproliferative neoplasms or MPNs are conditions of the blood that are related to leukemia but in effect they are a very mild form that resembles the first steps towards cancer. They are characterised by the overproduction of red and white blood cells, which increases the risk of strokes and heart attacks. Many cases of MPDs are caused by a mutation in a gene called JAK2. When the JAK2 gene has mutated, it sends abnormal messages to the blood stem cells to produce more and more blood cells.

Scientists have found that a particular region of chromosome 9 that carries the JAK2 gene is predisposed to acquiring mutations, but only in individuals with a particular genetic makeup. It is likely that this finding will lead to a much better understanding of how the JAK2 gene mutations happen and why they lead to an increased risk of someone developing an MPD.

The study, carried out at the Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory in Salisbury and the University of Southampton, has proved that people carrying this mutation-prone region of DNA on chromosome 9 that includes the JAK2 gene have triple the risk of developing an MPD. The chromosome 9 variant is present in 40% of the population in the United Kingdom but only 1 in 20,000 people develop an MPD each year. Nonetheless, the new research has confirmed that the inheritance of this genetic variant can contribute to inherited susceptibility to develop an MPD.The study found that the link was especially strong in polycythaemia vera (PV), one of the main three MPDs.

Professor Nick Cross, from the University of Southampton (University RoadSouthampton SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom, Tel. +44 (0)23 8059 5000, Fax +44 (0)23 8059 3131) who led the research team, said: “This research provides strong evidence that at least half of the cases of PV diagnosed each year are linked to an inherited genetic variant on chromosome 9. Whilst this risk is still very small it nonetheless confirms that individual susceptibility to acquiring cancer-causing mutations is linked to genetic inheritance. Now that we have this evidence we can carry out studies to determine exactly how the variant contributes to this risk.”

Dr Shabih Syed, Scientific Director at UK-based Leukaemia Research who sponsored the reserach, adds: “This is a very important step forward in our knowledge of the causes of myeloproliferative disorders. It helps us to understand why some people might be predisposed to acquiring genetic mutations that lead to cancers.”

For more information:

Read these PubMed abstracts:

What to tell your patients:

Illustrations courtesy of the European Hematology Association.

Friday, December 5, 2008

New Mammography Technology Effective in Detecting Breast Cancer

Positron emission mammography or PEM, a new technique for imaging the breast, is not affected by either breast density or a woman’s hormonal status, two factors that limit the effectiveness of standard mammography and MRI at detecting cancer, according to a study presented during the 94th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting (November 30 – December 5, 2008) of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) on Tuesday.

“The ability of positron emission mammography or PEM to detect cancer does not appear to be adversely affected by breast density, hormone replacement therapy or menopausal status,” explained the lead researcher Kathy Schilling, M.D., director of breast imaging and intervention at the Center for Breast Care at Boca Raton Community Hospital in Florida. “The sensitivity of PEM is equal to or better than breast MRI, and PEM has fewer false-positive results.”

The ability of x-ray mammography, a standard screening tool for breast cancer, to detect lesions is reduced when performed on dense breasts, where tissue is less fatty and more glandular. Breast MRI is effective at detecting cancer in dense breasts and is increasingly being used to screen women at high risk for breast cancer. However, MRI has a high incidence of false-positive test results that indicate cancer is present when it is not. Researchers believe these false positives are due in part to hormonal changes that occur during a woman’s menstrual cycle.

“Unless the MRI is performed on day seven through 14 of a woman’s cycle, reading MRI images is extremely difficult,” Dr. Schilling said. “This is a significant problem with breast MRI.” Because hormones do not have the same effect on PEM results, Dr. Schilling believes the imaging technique could play a significant role both in preoperatively evaluating breast cancer patients and in screening high-risk patients.

In the study, 208 patients with breast cancer underwent PEM, an application of high-resolution breast positron emission tomography (PET) in which a small amount of radioactive material is injected into the body to measure metabolic activity and determine the presence of disease. The researchers used a PET unit specially developed for the breast and small body parts to perform the PEM exam.

Of 189 malignant lesions imaged, PEM detected 176 for an overall sensitivity rate of 93 percent. Fifteen percent were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a noninvasive cancer confined to the ducts of the breast; 85 percent were invasive cancer.

PEM successfully detected cancer in 100 percent of fatty breasts, 93 percent of dense breasts, 85 percent of extremely dense breasts, 93 percent of women both with and without a history of hormone replacement therapy, 90 percent of pre-menopausal women and 94 percent of post-menopausal women.

According to Dr. Schilling, PEM is well tolerated by patients, who sit upright during the exam and are not alone or closely confined as they would be during an MRI exam. While breast MRI exams produce more than 2,000 images to be interpreted, PEM produces just 48 images that can be correlated with a woman’s mammogram.

“PEM is easier to use, easier to interpret and easier on the patients than MRI,” Dr. Shilling said. “It is also ideal for those patients whose MRI is difficult to interpret due to hormonal influences, women with implants, patients with metal in their bodies, or patients who suffer from claustrophobia. It is exciting that we now have a functional imaging approach with high sensitivity that complements our current anatomic imaging modalities,” she added.

Positron Emission Mammography at a Glance
  • Positron emission mammography (PEM) is an effective tool for detecting breast cancer.
  • Dense breast tissue and hormonal status can hinder other breast imaging techniques.
  • PEM shows high sensitivity and is not limited by these factors.
  • PEM, also known as high-resolution breast PET, has fewer false-positive results than breast MRI.

Click here to read the abstract (Effect of Breast Density, Menopausal Status, and Hormone Use in High Resolution Positron Emission Mammography).