Onco'Zine - Today

Latest Videos - Onco'Zine

The Lancet Oncology

Showing posts with label triple-negative breast cancer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label triple-negative breast cancer. Show all posts

Thursday, June 25, 2009

The IMPAKT of a New Drug Target in Breast Cancer

New and exciting results presented at the first IMPAKT Breast Cancer Conference (Brussels, Belgium, May 7 - 9) an international medical meeting focusing on IMProving cAre and Knowledge through Translational Research, may help scientists develop treatments for women with a type of breast cancer that currently does not respond to targeted therapies.

Although most people generally think of breast cancer as a single disease, doctors have recently come to understand that it actually comes in a variety of different ‘subtypes’. Each different subtype has different risk factors, different rates of progression, different treatment options, and a different prognosis. They are diagnosed based upon the presence three ‘receptors’ found on cancer cells: estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu).

Over the years, effective treatments have been developed to target each of these receptors. Some cancers, however, are estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-negative and HER2-negative, and are better known as ‘triple-negative’ breast cancers.

Triple-negative tumors generally do not respond to receptor-targeted treatments and is clinically characterized as more aggressive and less responsive to standard treatments. This form of breast cancer is generally associated with poorer overall patient prognosis and is more common among women with BRCA1 gene mutations. Furthermore, for reasons not yet well understood, triple-negative breast cancer is also more frequently diagnosed in younger women and African-American women. Researchers include triple-negative breast cancers are part of the subgroup of ‘basal-type’ breast cancers.

The role of androgens (AR)
In recent years, scientists have begun looking for new targets in these triple-negative breast cancers. One of the targets that has been identified is the androgen-receptor.

Studies have shown that the risk of breast cancer is increased in postmenopausal women with high estrogen levels as well as in women with high androgen levels. While the mechanism by which androgens contribute to breast cancer is not well understood, but studies have shown that androgens can induce proliferative changes in breast tissue. Furthermore, animal models have shown that administration of both estrogen and androgens can induce tumor formation.
Other studies have show that BRCA1 is a coactivator of the androgen-receptor (AR), making this an interesting and viable target.

GeparTrio Trial
At the IMPAKT Breast Cancer Conference, Sibylle Loibl MD, PhD, and colleagues report results from the GeparTrio trial (n=1,711) in which all patients with primary breast cancer received treatment with three chemotherapy drugs, including docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Almost half of the 682 patients (47.8%) expressed androgen receptor.The patient population in this German Breast Group (GBG) study was made up of patients with histologically confirmed unilateral or bilateral primary carcinoma of the breast (confirmed histologically by core biopsy) and patients with a tumor lesion in the breast with a palpable size of .2 cm in maximum diameter.

The researchers found that among those with triple-negative tumors the expression of the androgen receptor was correlated with a lower likelihood of an effective treatment.

“This group has looked for the expression of androgen receptor in breast cancer and found a sub-group of the population who do express it, and have shown that these patients respond worse to chemotherapy than those whose tumors do not express androgen receptor,” said Professor Jose Baselga, co-chair of the IMPAKT Conference.

The study showed a significant correlation between androgen receptor and tumor grading (PP=.006), expression of estrogen/progesterone status (P<.001) and age, and further revealed a pathological complete response in 14.2% of androgen receptor-positive patients vs. 31.9% of androgen receptor-negative patients (P<.001). The total pathological complete response was 21.4%. Among 86 triple-negative tumors analyzed (12.6% of total), 40.7% had a pathological complete response. 27.9% of the analyzed tumors expressed androgen receptor (AR+). For the remaining triple-negative androgen receptor-negative tumors (AR-), the pathological complete response rate was 43.5% vs. 33.3% for the triple-negative androgen receptor-positive tumors (P=.387). Baselga noted that a clinical trial is currently underway to try and target the androgen receptor in breast cancer. “I think we are seeing the birth of a new concept in breast cancer—the androgen-receptor-positive breast cancer,” Professor Baselga said. “This is an important development in finding new targets that we can attack with new drugs in the future.”

More IMPAKT Results
Unrelated but interesting results presented during the IMPAKT conference, which is designed to present and discuss advances in translational research and ways to quickly transform laboratory discoveries into tools that clinicians can use to help make decisions about the way they treat patients in their daily practice, included a presentation about a genetic test that helps reduce the need for second surgery in Breast cancer treatment.

This new rapid test can confirm quickly and accurately that breast cancer has most likely not spread into adjacent lymph nodes, offering reassurance to patients and reducing the need for a second operation. The test takes roughly 35 minutes to produce results and can be performed while the patient is having the initial surgery to remove the primary tumour.

Earlier studies have shown that the test can detect cancer that has spread to nearby lymph nodes. Currently, when a woman is having surgery to remove a breast cancer, surgeons take a sample from the so-called 'sentinel node.' This is the lymph node most directly connected to the breast, and the place the cancer is likely to spread to first.

The sentinel node biopsy is normally analysed by a pathologist who looks carefully for the presence of cancerous cells, in a process that can take several hours. If these cells have grown to a diameter between 0.2 mm and 2 mm — known as a micro metastasis -- the patient is considered to be at risk of a worse outcome. She would then usually be advised to return to the operating theatre to have all the lymph nodes in that region removed.

“This process of trying to identify micro metastases takes a lot of time and money,” explains conference co-chair Prof Martine Piccart from Institut Jules Bordet in Brussels, Belgium. “The new technique allows you to make the diagnosis of micro metastases while the surgery is underway, meaning the patient does not have to suffer the disruption of undergoing another operation.” To see whether the test results predicted the spread of cancer to other lymph nodes in the armpit, researchers in Belgium, the US and the UK tested sentinel nodes removed from 1,138 patients.

Once removed, each node was cut into thin slices. Alternating slices were then tested using either the new gene test or traditional pathology methods. If either test returned a positive result, the patient then had all lymph nodes from that armpit removed and tested. The new test provided a particularly high 'negative predictive value', they found, meaning that it accurately predicted whether the remaining nodes were free of cancer. “Remarkably, when the new test gives a negative result — meaning it finds no spread of cancer to the sentinel node — it really predicts very well the status of the other lymph nodes,” said Prof Piccart.

Other interesting presentation
  • Gene Sinature Identifies Breast Cancer Pahtiens who will respond to chemotherapy. Researchers have identified a genetic signature that can predict which breast cancer patients will respond well to treatment with epirubicin, a widely used form of chemotherapy. Although among the most effective chemotherapies in breast cancer, a small proportion of women suffer severe side-effects. By identifying those women who are most likely to benefit from treatment, doctors may be able to ensure fewer women are unnecessarily exposed to that risk. The new study shows that this goal can be achieved by developing more sophisticated ways to use older drugs.
  • Gene Signature predicts good outcome in Breast Cancer. Researchers have identified a genetic signature that can predict an improved clinical outcome in patients with breast cancer, and which could help in the development of new targeted therapies. By analyzing the expression of different genes induced by a specific mutation in a molecule called PIK3CA, a critical part of the pathway commonly deregulated in breast cancer, they found that these genes were correlated with an improved clinical outcome in over 1500 women with the disease.

    For more information, see the presentation

    Also, read PubMed abstracts:

    Also Read:

    Tuesday, June 23, 2009

    BSI-201, an Investigational Drug, plus Chemotherapy May Offer New Treatment Option for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

    A randomized Phase II study, featured during the plenary session of the 45th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) , shows that women with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who received the investigational PARP inhibitor BSI-201, in combination with conventional chemotherapy, lived significantly longer and experienced significantly better progression-free survival than women who received standard chemotherapy alone.

    The results of this study provide early evidence that BSI-201, a potent inhibitor of PARP1, or poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1, is a promising treatment for women with triple-negative breast cancer, an aggressive form of the disease for which we need new, more effective therapies,” said Joyce O’Shaughnessy, MD, co-director of the Breast Cancer Research Program at Baylor-Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center in Dallas, Texas.

    Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) are particularly hard to treat since they lack receptors for estrogen, progesterone and HER2, which are targeted by widely available and effective drugs. African American women are 3 times more likely than white or Hispanic women to be diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer.

    In this study, clinical benefit rate (defined by complete and partial responses and stable disease of at least 6 months), response rate, progression-free survival (the time it takes for cancer to progress), and overall survival were compared among 116 women with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who were randomly assigned to receive a standard chemotherapy treatment (gemcitabine and carboplatin) plus BSI-201, or standard treatment alone.

    Approximately 62 percent of patients receiving BSI-201 showed clinical benefit, compared with 21 percent in the chemotherapy only group. The overall response rate to treatment with the drug combination containing BSI-201 was significantly greater (48 percent) than in the group receiving only standard chemotherapy (16 percent). Women who received BSI-201 had a median survival of 9.2 months and median progression-free survival of 6.9 months compared with 5.7 months and 3.3 months, respectively, in women who received standard treatment alone.

    Efficacy and Safety
    BiPar Sciences Inc, a California-based subsidiary of French drug maker Sanofi–Aventis involved in the development of novel cancer therapies, reported interim safety data from this trial during the annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS) in December 2008, showing that the drug was well tolerated with no added toxicities compared with chemotherapy alone.

    While inhibition of PARP has demonstrated significant anti-tumor effects in several cancers, its activity does not appear to be critical for normal, non-cancerous cells. Thus, PARP inhibition has the potential to impair a fundamental mechanism of tumor growth without rendering damage to normal cells, implying a lower risk for side effects in patients who receive PARP-inhibitor-based therapies

    In general, BSI-201 has shown a strong safety profile and no significant toxicities attributable to drug in studies of more than 200 patients treated to date with monotherapy, as well as in combination with chemotherapeutic regimens.

    In the trial, the incidence of side effects was similar between the two groups. BSI-201 itself was well-tolerated and did not contribute any new side effects nor add to the known side effects of gemcitabine and carboplatin.

    Future research
    The researchers believe that BSI-201 has first-in-class and best-in-class potential as targeted therapy for several types of cancer. The trial drug is a leading candidate in the field of PARP inhibitors and is the furthest along in clinical development of this novel therapeutic approach.

    Based on the results of the Phase II trial, California based BiPar Sciences Inc will be initiating a Phase III clinical trial in triple negative metastatic breast cancer in the second half of 2009. This Phase III program has been guided by preliminary safety and efficacy data from a Phase II study in the same patient population.


    ASCO 2009 abstract:

    For more information (posters):

    Also read these Pubmed abstracts:

    Help your Patient to better understand:

    Photo courtesy of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

    PARP Inhibitors Show Promise for Hard-to-Treat (Breast) Cancers

    Two studies, including one featured during the plenary session of the 45th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), report promising data on a new class of targeted drugs called PARP inhibitors. The plenary study reports that women with hard-to-treat 'triple-negative' breast cancer who received the PARP inhibitor BSI-201 along with conventional chemotherapy had better outcomes than women who received chemotherapy alone. A second study reports that women with BRCA-deficient advanced breast cancer experienced tumor shrinkage after receiving the PARP inhibitor olaparib as a single agent.

    The two new studies report results on the effect of a new class of targeted therapy called PARP inhibitors on traditionally difficult-to-treat breast cancers – so-called 'triple-negative' breast cancer and BRCA1- and BRCA2 deficient breast cancers.

    PARP is short for ‘poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase.’ Cancer cells use the PARP enzyme to repair DNA damage, including the damage inflicted by chemotherapy drugs. Preclinical studies indicate that PARP inhibitors could enhance the efficacy of radiation therapy and chemotherapies such as alkylating agents and platinum-based drugs by preventing malignant cells from repairing damaged DNA, ultimately leading to impaired tumor growth and apoptosis.

    PARP Concept
    The concept is based on the fact that BRCA1 and BRCA2 are tumor suppressor genes that help control normal cell growth and cell death by regulating the repair of double strand breaks in DNA. Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes can impair this function, leaving cells unable to repair their own DNA, as well as causing the uncontrolled growth that is characteristic of cancer cells. Women who inherit mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes have significantly higher risks for breast and ovarian cancer

    Exploiting impaired DNA repair function
    PARP inhibitors work by exploiting the impaired DNA repair function inherent in BRCA-associated cancers. In this case, inhibition of PARP leads to failure to repair DNA single strand breaks, which in turn, result in DNA double strand breaks. These effects are particularly detrimental to BRCA-associated cancer cells. Ultimately, failure to repair both DNA single strand breaks and double strand breaks, leads to cancer cell death.

    Researchers interested in understanding how to exploit the DNA damage on tumor cells inflicting by anti-cancer agents, are now examining whether drugs that inhibit the PARP enzyme will indeed diminish the self-repair mechanism and make cancer cells more sensitive to treatment and promote cancer cell death.

    Currently, a number of PARP inhibitors are studied in Phase I, II and III trials for a variety of cancer indications. These include:
    • ABT-888 in Metastatic melanoma (Abbott Laboratories). Preliminary trial results show that this drug candidate has good oral bioavailability, can cross the blood-brain barrier, and potentiates temozolomide, platinums, cyclophosphamide, and radiation in syngeneic and xenograft tumor models. Broad spectrum chemopotentiation and radiopotentiation makes this compound an attractive candidate for further clinical evaluation.
    • AG-014699 in Breast cancer, ovarian cancer and melanoma (Agouron/Pfizer Inc.). Preliminary results of a phase II trial of AG-014699 and temozolomide in patients with metastatic melanoma indicated that the addition of AG-14699 enhanced temozolomide-associated myelosuppression, and that the response rate for combination treatment was higher than for temozolomide alone.
    • Olaparib (AZD2281 / KU-0059436) in Breast cancer and ovarian cancer (AstraZeneca). Combination of AZD2281 with cisplatin or carboplatin increased the recurrence-free and overall survival, suggesting that AZD2281 potentiates the effect of these DNA-damaging agents. Preliminary results demonstrate in vivo sensitivity and efficacy of AZD2281, alone or in combination with cisplatin, and provide strong support for AZD2281 as a novel targeted therapeutic against BRCA-deficient cancers.
    • BSI-201 in Breast cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine cancerand glioblastoma multiforme (BiPar Sciences Inc.). Data from a Phase II trial of BSI-201 in metastatic breast cancer patients whose tumors were negative for three common breast cancer markers: estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2, confirmed that the patients' tumors had significant upregulation of PARP, compared with normal breast tissue, supporting the targeting of this enzyme with BSI-201.

    ASCO 2009 Abstracts

    For more information, read these PubMed abstracts:

    For more information:

    Also read:

    Monday, June 22, 2009

    Progress Against Breast and Gynecologic Cancers: Highlights from ASCO

    Advances in the treatment of cancers that primarily affect women, including breast and gynecologic cancers, were presented in Orlando at the 45th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the world’s leading professional organization representing physicians who care for people with cancer.

    Studies presented during the 45th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology demonstrate continued progress against breast, ovarian and cervical cancers, which are major causes of cancer mortality worldwide,” said Eric P. Winer, MD, Chair of ASCO’s Cancer Communications Committee and professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School. “One study tells us that women can safely avoid unnecessary blood tests and can delay toxic treatment for ovarian cancer recurrence without compromising their longevity. Others report on a promising new class of targeted drugs for some of the most difficult-to-treat breast cancers. And others provide more effective and less invasive options for treating cervical cancer, which is a particularly significant problem in developing countries.”

    Studies highlighted during ASCO include:

    • No survival advantage to treating ovarian cancer relapse based on rising CA125 levels, compared with waiting for symptoms. A study featured in ASCO’s plenary session reports that starting treatment immediately for an ovarian cancer relapse based on CA125 protein levels found in the blood does not improve overall survival, compared with delaying treatment until symptoms arise. The findings should allow women to avoid the anxiety and cost associated with frequent blood testing and the toxicity of early treatment.
    • PARP inhibitors show promise for hard-to-treat breast cancers. Two studies, including one featured in ASCO’s plenary session, report promising data on a new class of targeted drugs called PARP inhibitors. Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) has a well-established role in DNA repair processes, and small molecule inhibitors of PARP have been developed as chemotherapy sensitisers for the treatment of cancer. The subsequent demonstration that PARP inhibition is selective for BRCA1 or BRCA2 deficiency suggests that PARP inhibitors may be particularly useful for the treatment of cancer with BRCA mutations. The plenary study reports that women with hard-to-treat “triple-negative” breast cancer who received the PARP inhibitor BSI-201 (BiPar Sciences Inc) along with conventional chemotherapy had 60% better survival outcomes compared with chemotherapy alone than women who received chemotherapy alone. A second study reports that women with BRCA-deficient advanced breast cancer experienced tumor shrinkage after receiving the PARP inhibitor olaparib as a single agent.
    • Gemcitabine plus chemoradiation improves cervical cancer survival. Adding the drug gemcitabine (Gemzar) to cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy extends overall survival among women with locally advanced cervical cancer. This study was primarily conducted in developing countries, where cervical cancer screening programs are limited.
    • Sentinel node biopsy is an effective option for early-stage cervical cancer. Most women with early-stage cervical cancer can safely undergo sentinel node biopsy – a technique in which only one or two lymph nodes are removed to determine whether cancer has spread – in lieu of the traditional, more invasive pelvic lymph node removal, which can lead to more significant side effects. Sentinel node biopsy was also as effective for detecting cancer spread to atypical areas of the pelvis.

    For more information, read these PubMed abstracts

    Help your patients understand:

    • For consumer-oriented information about the studies in this article, please refer your patients to ASCO’s patient website.

    Thursday, January 8, 2009

    Triple-negative breast cancer: risk factors to potential targets

    Breast cancer is not one single disease, but knows different subgroups originating in the breast. Triple-negative breast cancer, one of these subgroups, has recently been recognized as an important subgroup of breast cancer with a distinct outcome and therapeutic approach when compared with other subgroups of breast cancer. Triple-negative breast cancer comprises primarily, but not exclusively, of the basal-like subtype and refers to a specific subtype of breast cancer that does not express the genes for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) or Her2/neu.

    Depending on its stage of diagnosis, triple-negative breast cancer can be extremely aggressive and is more likely to recur and metastasize than other subtypes of breast cancer. It typically is responsive to chemotherapy, although it can be more difficult to treat because it is unresponsive to the most effective receptor targeted treatments

    Late last year, researchers from the Indiana University Department of Medicine, Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, led by Dr. Bryan Paul Schneider MD, reported details of a new studies and findings in the area of breast cancer risk factors. The results were published in the journal Clinical Cancer Research.

    Commenting on the research results, Schneider explained: ‘We do not yet have an assay to identify basal-like breast cancer in clinical samples, so triple-negative breast cancer has become a commonly used proxy for this subtype. The molecular biology and pathophysiology of triple-negative breast cancer are not completely understood, but understanding is improving rapidly with the advent of sophisticated molecular biology platforms.’

    The established risk factors of breast cancer as a whole may not apply to this unique subgroup of patients. Because triple-negative breast cancer is defined by the absence of a target, there are currently limitations to using a tailored therapeutic approach, leaving conventional cytotoxic therapies as the mainstay.

    ‘Active preclinical and clinical research programs focus on defining the clinical behavior, delineating the risk factors, and more completely understanding the molecular biology of triple-negative breast cancer to improve prevention, optimize conventional agents, and unveil novel therapeutic targets,' Schneider said.

    For more information, read:

    Also read PubMed abstracts:

    See online video: