Onco'Zine - Today

Latest Videos - Onco'Zine

The Lancet Oncology

Showing posts with label Roche. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Roche. Show all posts

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Study of New Treatment for Advanced Melanoma Shows Rapid Shrinking of Tumors

Researchers have made significant advances in the treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma – one of the most difficult cancers to treat successfully once it has started to spread – according to a study presented at Europe’s largest cancer congress, ECCO 15 – ESMO 34, the 15th congress of the European CanCer Organisation and the 34th congress of the European Society for Medical Oncology, in Berlin, Germany.

In the phase I extension study, researchers have seen rapid and dramatic shrinking of metastatic tumors in patients treated with a new compound that blocks the activity of the cancer-causing mutation of the BRAF gene, which is implicated in about 50% melanomas and 5% of colorectal cancers. In new results from 31 melanoma patients with the BRAF mutation who were treated with 960mg of PLX4032, twice a day, 64% (14) of the 22 patients who could be evaluated so far met the official criteria for partial response (this involves the diameter of tumors shrinking by at least 30% for at least a month). A further six of the 22 patients also showed a response, but, at the time of the congress presentation, it was too early to say whether the tumors’ would shrink far enough to meet these criteria.

Dr Paul Chapman, an attending physician on the Melanoma/Sarcoma service at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (New York, USA) and who was one of the leaders of the trial, told a news briefing: “We are very excited about these results. Of the 22 patients we have been able to evaluate so far, 20 have had some objective tumor shrinkage. This is impressive as they all had metastatic disease and most of them had failed several prior therapies. A lot of these patients were pretty sick but many of them had a significant and rapid improvement in the way they function. We’ve had patients come off oxygen and we’ve got several patients who have been able to come off narcotic pain medication soon after starting treatment.”

The trial is investigating PLX4032, a novel, oral small molecule for the treatment of melanoma and other cancers harboring the V600E mutation of the BRAF kinase gene, in patients with the BRAF mutation, and results from the first 55 patients were reported at a cancer meeting earlier this year (ASCO 2009). These data had been aimed at finding the best dose of PLX4032 to give to patients. However, the phase I extension data reported at ECCO 15 – ESMO 34 focuses on a subsequent group of an additional 31 patients who were all treated at the maximum tolerated dose of the drug (a 960 mg pill twice a day). All the patients had the BRAF mutation.

Dr Chapman said: “What makes this treatment different from standard chemotherapy is that standard chemotherapy attacks the machinery involved in cell division; so to stop the cancer cells dividing uncontrollably, most standard chemotherapy aims to block the mechanism of division by interfering directly with DNA replication or with microtubules in the dividing cells. PLX4302 is different because it attacks the genetic program that is causing the cells to divide uncontrollably, and we think the BRAF mutation is driving that program. The drug is blocking the genetics of the tumor, rather than trying to interfere with the proliferation of the cells and, as a result, there are fewer side effects, although there are some. We are seeing some pretty dramatic and rapid responses, and they are occurring in sites where we rarely see responses to chemotherapy, such as in the bone.

“There are some important caveats. All these patients had failed previous therapies, either chemotherapy or treatment with Interleukin 2, as well as surgery. However, we know that only 10-30% of patients will respond to standard chemotherapy, so it’s not surprising that our patients had not responded, or have responded and then the cancer has recurred. In our study 64% of patients have had a partial response, but because we are only treating patients with the BRAF mutation, we are cutting out about 40% of melanoma patients who do not have this mutation and whom we know will not respond to this treatment. That is one reason why we are seeing a much higher response than with conventional treatments.

“Also, we don’t know yet how long these responses will last, and we have had patients whose cancer has progressed after initially responding; so we are putting a lot of effort in to studying the patients who do relapse, trying to understand how their tumors have become resistant.

“In addition, one of the main side effects we’ve seen is that some patients develop early, non-melanoma skin cancers such as squamous cell skin cancer. We are very vigilant about this and although they are very easy to cut out, it’s something we are keeping a close eye on.”

Dr Chapman and his colleagues are planning a phase II trial of 90 patients starting at the end of this year. In addition, a large phase III randomized controlled trial involving several hundred patients is planned to start either at the end of this year or beginning of next year involving centers in North America, Europe and Australia.

Dr Chapman said it was too early to be talking about a cure for advanced melanoma, but that this drug had potential. “Most of us think that a drug like this would ultimately be part of the regimen, but that we might need additional drugs with it to complete the cure. Right now we are seeing dramatic responses but it’s too early to say whether we’ve actually cured people because most patients still have evidence of some level of tumor on their skin. I think this is a huge step forward; whether or not it will be sufficient by itself really remains to be seen.”

Clinical trials to support a registration program for product approval are targeted to start shortly. Plexxikon Inc and Roche are co-developing PLX4032 under their 2006 license and collaboration agreement.

For more information:

Also read these PubMed abstracts:

Images courtesy American Society of Clinical oncology (ASCO).

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Rituximab (MabThera) approved in Europe for use in patients with previously-treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)

Swiss pharmaceutical giant F. Hoffman-La Roche (CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland) today announced that the European Commission (European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products/EMEA) has approved rituximab (MabThera, known as Rituxan in the United States, Japan and Canada) for use in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or CLL is is a blood and bone marrow disease that usually se slowly worsens. It is the second most common type of leukemia in adults and often occurs during or after middle age, accounting for approximately 30-40% of all forms of leukemia in Western countries. Overall incidence of CLL is around three per 100,000 and is 30% more common in men than women. The incidence of CLL is markedly increased in patients older than 65 with a median age at diagnosis of 72 years. While CLL is generally considered a disease that is slow to progress, a significant proportion of patients have rapidly progressing forms of the disease. The disease rarely occurs in children.

The approval of rituximab, a therapeutic antibody that binds to the CD20 antigen on the surface of normal and malignant B-cells, is supported by the impressive results from REACH, the largest randomized clinical trial ever reported in previously-treated CLL. The study, conducted at 88 sites across 17 countries, included 552 patients with relapsed or refractory CLL. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival.

Physicians can now prescribe rituximab in combination with chemotherapy (fludarabine and cyclophosphamide) to patients who have been treated for the disease but whose cancer has returned or who have not responded appropriately to therapy. Rituximab is already the standard of care for initial treatment of CLL.

“This approval will make MabThera plus chemotherapy the gold-standard therapy for people living with relapsed or refractory CLL”, said Professor Tadeusz Robak, Medical University of Lodz, Poland and principal investigator for the REACH trial. “Although all patients with CLL will unfortunately eventually relapse, treatment with MabThera significantly prolongs remission. This will help ease the burden of the cancer and enable patients to enjoy the relative freedom that comes with this relief from symptoms.”

The results of REACH showed that patients with relapsed or refractory CLL who were treated with rituximab in combination with chemotherapy lived an average ten months longer without their disease progressing, compared to those receiving chemotherapy alone (30.6 months vs. 20.6 months – based on SmPC REACH data submitted by Roche to EMEA). At present, CLL is considered incurable and the aim of treatment is to control the disease by managing symptoms and extending the time patients live without their disease worsening.

“Today’s approval of MabThera in CLL throws a life line to patients suffering from this terrible disease”, said William M. Burns, CEO, Roche Pharmaceuticals Division. “After the approval for use in patients with previously untreated CLL earlier this year, this latest license extension means that MabThera can now offer real hope to all patients with CLL.”

Earlier this year, Roche received marketing approval for rituximab in combination with chemotherapy in previously-untreated patients with advanced CLL.

For more information

Physician information

Information for your patients:

Images courtesy American Society of Clinical oncology (ASCO)

Monday, July 13, 2009

Erlotinib Improves Overall Survival After Initial Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Lung Cancer

Results from SATURN, a pivotal Phase III study, met a key secondary endpoint of extending overall survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received erlotinib (Tarceva®, Genentech/Roche; OSI) immediately after their initial chemotherapy. A statistically significant improvement in overall survival was seen in the pre-planned final analysis of the total patient population in the study. The new data will be presented during the 13th World Conference on Lung Cancer to be held July 31 – August 4, 2009 in San Francisco.

Lung cancer is the most common cancer worldwide with 1.5 million new cases annually and NSCLC accounts for 85 – 90% of all lung cancers. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) progresses rapidly and survival rates are generally very poor. Most people are diagnosed with advanced stage disease and less than 5% of these advanced NSCLC patients survive for five years. Extending the time patients live and managing side effects are key treatment goals.

According to the American Cancer Society, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. In 2009, approximately 159,000 Americans will die from the disease.
Treating patients immediately following first-line chemotherapy versus waiting for the cancer to grow or spread before giving additional treatment represents a new approach in advanced NSCLC.

A new approach
Erlotinib is, as a Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Type 1/Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER1/EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, different from conventional chemotherapies.
Over-expression of EGFR is common in several solid tumors, such as colorectal cancer, lung carcinomas, and cancers of the head and neck. It correlates with increased metastasis, decreased survival and a poor prognosis. EGFR protects malignant tumors cells from the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, making these treatments less effective.

HER1 and EGFR receptors are directly involved in inter-cellular signaling in systems governing cell division and proliferation. By interfering with the function of these receptors, which are highly active and often over-expressed in rapidly dividing tumor cells, erlotinib inhibits EGFR-receptor tyrosine kinase activity, and may help to initiate pathways of apoptotic cell death. The interference with the cell signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation represents a novel approach to the treatment of solid tumors.

Today, erlotinib is the first and only EGFR oral targeted agent in second line with a proven and significant survival and symptom benefit in a broad range of patients with advanced lung cancer without the side effects associated with chemotherapy. The drug has been approved in the EU since September 2005 and in the US since November 2004 for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC after failure of at least one prior chemotherapy regimen.

Patient benefit
In the landmark registration study BR.21, a randomised controlled phase III clinical trial comparing erlotinib with placebo/best supportive care in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small lung cancer which took place in 17 countries around the world, erlotinib delivered effectiveness comparable to chemotherapy and significantly improves overall quality of life.

The registration study underlined that more patients on erlotinib had improvement in cough, pain, shortness of breath and overall physical function versus patients on placebo. In addition erlotinib did not induce the distressing side-effects associated with chemotherapy, such as nausea and vomiting. An added benefit, improving adherence, is that erlotinib is convenient as patients can take a tablet once a day at home rather than receive intravenous treatments in a hospital.

Global trial
SATURN, a global multicentre, double blind, randomized, prospective phase III study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of erlotinib vs. placebo in patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic NSCLC who had not progressed following first line platinum-based chemotherapy. The study involved more than 880 patients from approximately 160 centers; 438 received erlotinib and 451 placebo.

The study met its primary endpoint demonstrating a statistically significant extension of the time patients live without their disease worsening; there was a 41% increase compared with placebo (hazard ratio= 0.71, p-value <0.0001).>


“This study has now not only confirmed that immediate treatment with Tarceva after initial chemotherapy delayed the progression of disease, but also importantly helped patients in the study live longer,” said Professor Federico Cappuzzo, M.D., Istituto Clinico Humanitas IRCCS, Milan and principal investigator of the SATURN study. “This is good news for doctors and their patients since advanced lung cancer is one of the most challenging cancers to treat and is often associated with a very short life-expectancy.”

Commenting on the study, William M. Burns, CEO Division Roche Pharmaceuticals said, “This is the second set of data from large studies that has shown Tarceva helps patients with advanced lung cancer to live longer. These results confirm that Tarceva has an important role to play in improving the lives of patients earlier in the management of this devastating disease.”

Erlotinib is already a well established treatment in second-line management of advanced NSCLC after the failure of chemotherapy and is proven to extend survival for a broad range of patients in this setting. Most recently, presentation of the SATURN primary endpoint data analysis at ASCO 2009 showed that patients who received treatment with erlotinib immediately after initial chemotherapy if their cancer had not progressed had a 41% improvement in the length of time they lived without their disease getting worse compared to placebo.

Outcome confirmed
During the Annual Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Vincent A. Miller, MD., a medical oncologist from the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, presented results from the phase III ATLAS study supported findings in the SATURN study.

The ATLAS study, a global multicentre, randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study that enrolled 1,160 patients with locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic NSCLC, was designed to evaluate bevacizumab (Avastin®, Genentech/Roche) in combination with erlotinib (150 mg daily) versus bevacizumab alone, following bevacizumab in combination with a platin-containing doublet chemotherapy, in patients with stage IIIb/IV NSCLC.

The study showed that combined treatment with bevacizumab and erlotinib, immediately following initial therapy with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy was highly effective and significantly delayed disease progression for patients with advanced NSCLC, without the need for chemotherapy.

The positive results from these trials were encouraging because previous Phase III studies in which erlotinib was used as first-line therapy in combination with cytotoxic drugs (the TRIBUTE and TALENT studies) failed to demonstrate a survival advantage when erlotinib was added to conventional treatment regimens.

The overall survival data fron SATURN will be used to support the European and US applications for use of erlotinib as a first-line maintenance treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC. These applications were made to the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in March 2009 and are based on the pivotal Phase III SATURN trial. The FDA Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) review date will be on or about January 18, 2010.

Commenting on the overal product development, Colin Goddard, Ph.D., Chief Executive Officer of OSI Pharmaceuticals, Roche's US partner, said:"We are pleased with the launch of Tarceva in the U.S. to date and we continue to believe that Tarceva will emerge as a fundamentally important new agent in changing the paradigm for the treatment of cancer patients around the world. With our partners, Genentech and Roche, we are committed to executing a post-approval development plan, studying Tarceva in earlier stage lung cancer patients, in patients with other tumor types and combinations with other targeted therapies."

For more information:

ASCO 2009 Annual meeting:

Also read these PubMed abstracts:

Information for your patient:

Images courtesy American Society of Clinical oncology (ASCO)


Saturday, May 30, 2009

Surgical Removal of the Primary Tumor Not Immediately Needed in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

New research shows that patients who are newly diagnosed with metastatic, surgically incurable, colorectal cancer (mCRC) do not need immediate surgery to remove their primary tumor unless the tumor is causing complications.

Surgical removal of the primary tumor at the time of diagnosis was once standard practice and is still common in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Because cancer has already spread to other parts of the body by this stage, the purpose of this surgery is not to extend survival, but to prevent future complications, such as intestinal blockage, perforation of the bowel, and severe bleeding. However, over the past decade several new effective chemotherapy drugs for colorectal cancer have been introduced and until now there has been little data to assess whether this pre-emptive surgery is still warranted.

The research will be presented on Monday, June 1, by Philip B. Paty, MD, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, during the 45th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) being held from May 27 – June 2, 2009 in Orlando, Florida.

Incidence of metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC)
According to GLOBOCAN 2002, a cancer incidence database produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization (WHO), the worldwide incidence of colorectal cancer is approximately one million cases per year. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) reports that approximately 50 percent of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer will suffer from advanced disease that has metastasized to other parts of the body, most commonly to the liver.

Uncertain benefit
The researchers rationale is that in the absence of symptoms (bleeding, perforation, obstruction) or resectable metastatic disease, primary tumor resection in patients who present with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is of uncertain benefit.

The purpose of their study was to describe the frequency of intervention necessary to palliate the intact primary tumor in patients who present with synchronous stage IV CRC and receive up-front modern combination chemotherapy without prophylactic surgery.

“In this era of modern chemotherapy, routine surgery to remove the primary tumor in patients with unresectable metastases is no longer supported by the data,” explained Philip Paty, MD, an attending surgeon and vice chairman of clinical research at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and the study’s senior author. “In addition to being an unnecessary procedure that carries its own risks of morbidity and mortality, surgery delays the start of chemotherapy for several weeks, and in some cases may make the patient less fit for and less tolerant of chemotherapy. Unless there is an immediate need for surgery, patients should begin chemotherapy first.”

FOLFOX, IFL and FOLFIRI
This retrospective study identified 233 consecutive patients who presented with metastatic colorectal cancer between 2000 and 2006, and were treated with chemotherapy at MSKCC, but had no serious symptoms to prompt immediate surgery. The patients received one of three triple-drug chemotherapy combinations as their initial treatment (the regimens known as FOLFOX, IFL, and FOLFIRI).

Some were also treated with the targeted therapy bevacizumab (Avastin, Roche).

Investigators determined that 217 (93%) patients never developed complications that required removal of their tumor. For the 16 patients (7%) who did eventually need surgery, the vast majority (14/16) had successful operations.

10 patients (4%) required nonoperative intervention (stent or radiotherapy), whereas 213 (89%) never required any direct symptomatic management for their intact primary. Of those, 47 (20%) ultimately underwent elective colon resection at the time of metastasectomy and 8 (3%) during laparotomy for hepatic artery infusion pump placement. Neither use of bevacizumab, location of the primary tumor in the rectum, or metastatic disease burden was associated with increased intervention rate. In addition, when included as a time-varying covariate in a Cox regression model, the need for emergent intervention did not correlate with overall survival.

Most patients with synchronous stage IV CRC who receive up-front modern combination chemotherapy never required palliative surgery for their intact primary. The data support the use of chemotherapy, without routine prophylactic resection, as the appropriate standard practice for patients with neither obstructed nor hemorrhaging primary colorectal tumors in the setting of metastatic disease.

Overall, the researchers concluded that the mortality attributable to surgery was very low (0.8 percent), suggesting that this approach, by avoiding unnecessary surgery, improves the overall safety of treatment.

For more information:


PubMed abstracts:

Other ASCO 2009 abstracts:

Illustration courtesy of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.


Bevacizumab study does not meet primary endpoint, but results suggest future trials may hold promise for early-stage colon cancer treatment

Adding bevacizumab to standard adjuvant chemotherapy does not improve disease-free survival for early-stage colon cancer. This is the primary conclusion from the complete results from the first, randomized phase III trial of bevacizumab (Avastin, Roche) in early-stage colon cancer, known as NSABP C-08, conducted by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) and sponsored by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) under a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement between Genentech and NCI, and will be presented on Sunday, May 31, during the 45th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) being held from May 27 – June 2, 2009 in Orlando, Florida.

NSABP C-08 was the first study to report results on the use of bevacizumab as an adjuvant treatment. Bevacizumab targets the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor, a key driver of tumor angiogenesis – an essential process in the development and maintenance of blood vessels which is required for a tumor to grow and to spread (metastasize) to other parts of the body.

The results of the NSABP C-08 trial have found that adding bevacizumab to standard adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve disease-free survival (the time that patients are free of tumor recurrence) in early-stage colon cancer

The current study enrolled 2,710 patients who were randomized to receive six months of standard adjuvant chemotherapy or six months of adjuvant chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab plus an additional six months of bevacizumab after the chemotherapy had ended.

All patients in the study had stage II or stage III disease and first had surgery to remove their tumors. After a median follow-up of three years, the investigators found that 77.4 percent of patients in the experimental group (bevacizumab) were alive and free of disease, compared with 75.5 percent of patients in the control group, a difference that was not statistically significant. There were no unexpected side effects in either arm and the toxicities from bevacizumab were well tolerated.

“One interesting effect was that during the year that patients were receiving bevacizumab we saw a benefit in disease-free survival (DFS) that subsequently diminished when follow-up was completed,” said Norman Wolmark, MD, chairman of the Department of Human Oncology at Allegheny General Hospital and the study’s lead author. Patients receiving bevacizumab treatment had a 40 percent lower risk of cancer returning, however, this initial improvement over chemotherapy alone gradually diminished over time.

Commenting on the trial, Walmark continued “Our overall conclusion is that bevacizumab was not effective as an adjuvant treatment for early-stage colon cancer, but the transient benefit we saw in patients who received bevacizumab illustrates that we have more to learn about how this reagent works, and we need to design more clinical trials to determine how it can be used most effectively.”

No new safety signals for bevacizumab were observed in the study and careful review of the data did not provide evidence that cancer returns faster or more aggressively after bevacizumab therapy was stopped.

“These results are encouraging and suggest that Avastin may have an important role in early cancer treatment. We are committed to the ongoing program of Avastin in early-stage cancers and believe that these results could help us optimize the use of Avastin for the benefit of patients,’’ noted William M. Burns, CEO of the pharmaceutical division of Roche, a leader in research-focused healthcare.

Study Results
The NSABP C-08, a two-arm randomized prospective multi-center Phase III study evaluated the use of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (mFolfox6 + bevacizumab/mFF6+B) for the treatment of Stage II or III adenocarcinoma immediately following surgery (adjuvant therapy) compared to chemotherapy alone (mFolfox6/mFF6). The study showed the addition of one year of bevacizumab to chemotherapy did not result in a statistically significant improvement in overall disease-free survival (DFS). However, during the year of bevacizumab treatment there was an early and significant improvement in disease-free survival that diminished over the course of the study.

Disease-Free Survival was measured from the date of randomization to the date of any type of cancer recurrence or death from any cause. Patients enrolled in the study were randomized after surgery to receive either FOLFOX chemotherapy alone for six months or FOLFOX in combination with bevacizumab (intravenously every two weeks) for six months, followed by an additional six months of bevacizumab monotherapy. Patients continue to be followed for overall survival, a secondary endpoint of the study.

Overall in the study, there was 12 percent improvement in DFS that was not statistically significant (hazard ratio=0.89, p=0.15; risk reduction 11 percent). In the first year of the study, while patients received bevacizumab in addition to a standard six-months of adjuvant chemotherapy, disease-free survival improved by 67 percent compared to chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio=0.60; risk reduction of 40 percent). However, this early improvement in DFS began to diminish after the first year, and overall DFS was not improved.

NSABP C-08 included a comprehensive safety analysis that showed no new or unexpected safety events related to bevacizumab in the study. Specific severe (Grade 3 or greater) adverse events (AEs) that occurred with increased frequency in patients who received bevacizumab versus chemotherapy alone were: hypertension (12 percent vs. 1.8 percent), pain (11.1 percent vs. 6.3 percent), proteinuria (2.7 percent vs. 0.8 percent) and wound-healing complications (1.7 percent vs. 0.3 percent).

Other trials and standard of care
Bevacizumab is currently approved for metastatic colorectal, breast, and lung cancers and other trials are ongoing to evaluate it as an adjuvant treatment for a variety of solid tumors. Therapy with bevacizumab is the standard of care in advanced colon cancer treatment which will be further confirmed throughout the ASCO meeting with 53 efficacy and safety data presentations including more than 6,000 patients.

In addition to early-stage colon cancer, bevacizumab is being studied as an adjuvant treatment in other early-stage diseases: HER2-negative breast cancer, HER2-positive breast cancer, and non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer. Approximately 26,000 people are expected to participate in bevacizumab based adjuvant studies, making the bevacizumab development program one of the most comprehensive undertakings in cancer research since chemotherapy. The Avastin (bevacizumab) development program includes more than 450 clinical trials worldwide in approximately 30 different tumor types.

More than 500,000 patients have been treated with bevacizumab so far. A comprehensive clinical program with more than 450 clinical trials is investigating the use of bevacizumab in various tumor types (including colorectal, breast, lung, brain, gastric, ovarian, prostate and others) and different settings (advanced or early stage disease).

Mode of Action
The precise mode of action of bevacizumab helps control tumor growth and metastases with only a limited impact on side effects of chemotherapy.

The drug has proven survival benefits across multiple tumor types and is approved in Europe for the treatment of the advanced stages of four common types of cancer, including colorectal cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer and kidney cancer. These types of cancer collectively cause nearly 3 million deaths each year in the US alone.

In the US, bevacizumab was the first anti-angiogenesis therapy approved by the FDA and is now approved for the treatment of four tumor types: breast, colorectal, glioblastoma, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

For further information:

Other, related, abstracts

Folfox Background information:

Colorectal Cancer:

Pharmaceutical information:



New studies answer key questions about the treatment of gastrointestinal cancers

Findings from a number of large clinical trials of new treatment regimens for gastrointestinal cancers were released today at the 45th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), being held in Orlando, May 29 - June 2, 2009 and will be highlighted in Onco’Zine – The international Cancer Blog.

“The studies presented today answer many important questions about the best care for people with gastrointestinal cancers,” said Nicholas Petrelli, MD, medical director of the Helen F. Graham Cancer Center in Wilmington, Delaware. “These large, conclusive trials tell us what works, and importantly, tell us what doesn’t work. Some settle long-time debates in the field, others demonstrate that the current standard of care is actually superior to experimental treatments, and others will allow patients to avoid unnecessary side effects or surgery.”

The results presented include:

  • First-ever data on bevacizumab as adjuvant therapy finds no benefit in colon cancer: A phase III trial finds that adding the targeted therapy bevacizumab (Avastin, Roche), to standard adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve disease free survival for patients with locally advanced colon cancer.
  • Surgery unnecessary for majority of patients with advanced colorectal cancer: Most patients with metastatic colorectal cancer can safely avoid surgery on their primary tumors.
  • A trial compares common adjuvant treatments for pancreatic cancer: A phase III trial comparing the adjuvant treatments most commonly used for pancreatic cancer in the United States and Europe, gemcitabine (Gemzar, Eli Lilly and Company) and 5-FU/FA, respectively, found that there is no difference in survival between the two regimens, though gemcitabine was associated with fewer side effects.
  • The largest study to date on anal cancer supports the current standard: A phase III study finds that the current standard of care for anal cancer should not be changed, and that ongoing maintenance therapy after initial treatment is not effective.
  • Oxaliplatin does not improve outcomes for rectal cancer: Adding oxaliplatin (Eloxatin, Sanofi-Aventis) to standard treatment in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer does not improve tumor response. However, a preliminary analysis seems to suggests that the treatment may reduce distant metastases.

For more information:

Reference: