Onco'Zine - Today

Latest Videos - Onco'Zine

The Lancet Oncology

Showing posts with label brain tumor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label brain tumor. Show all posts

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Study of New Treatment for Advanced Melanoma Shows Rapid Shrinking of Tumors

Researchers have made significant advances in the treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma – one of the most difficult cancers to treat successfully once it has started to spread – according to a study presented at Europe’s largest cancer congress, ECCO 15 – ESMO 34, the 15th congress of the European CanCer Organisation and the 34th congress of the European Society for Medical Oncology, in Berlin, Germany.

In the phase I extension study, researchers have seen rapid and dramatic shrinking of metastatic tumors in patients treated with a new compound that blocks the activity of the cancer-causing mutation of the BRAF gene, which is implicated in about 50% melanomas and 5% of colorectal cancers. In new results from 31 melanoma patients with the BRAF mutation who were treated with 960mg of PLX4032, twice a day, 64% (14) of the 22 patients who could be evaluated so far met the official criteria for partial response (this involves the diameter of tumors shrinking by at least 30% for at least a month). A further six of the 22 patients also showed a response, but, at the time of the congress presentation, it was too early to say whether the tumors’ would shrink far enough to meet these criteria.

Dr Paul Chapman, an attending physician on the Melanoma/Sarcoma service at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (New York, USA) and who was one of the leaders of the trial, told a news briefing: “We are very excited about these results. Of the 22 patients we have been able to evaluate so far, 20 have had some objective tumor shrinkage. This is impressive as they all had metastatic disease and most of them had failed several prior therapies. A lot of these patients were pretty sick but many of them had a significant and rapid improvement in the way they function. We’ve had patients come off oxygen and we’ve got several patients who have been able to come off narcotic pain medication soon after starting treatment.”

The trial is investigating PLX4032, a novel, oral small molecule for the treatment of melanoma and other cancers harboring the V600E mutation of the BRAF kinase gene, in patients with the BRAF mutation, and results from the first 55 patients were reported at a cancer meeting earlier this year (ASCO 2009). These data had been aimed at finding the best dose of PLX4032 to give to patients. However, the phase I extension data reported at ECCO 15 – ESMO 34 focuses on a subsequent group of an additional 31 patients who were all treated at the maximum tolerated dose of the drug (a 960 mg pill twice a day). All the patients had the BRAF mutation.

Dr Chapman said: “What makes this treatment different from standard chemotherapy is that standard chemotherapy attacks the machinery involved in cell division; so to stop the cancer cells dividing uncontrollably, most standard chemotherapy aims to block the mechanism of division by interfering directly with DNA replication or with microtubules in the dividing cells. PLX4302 is different because it attacks the genetic program that is causing the cells to divide uncontrollably, and we think the BRAF mutation is driving that program. The drug is blocking the genetics of the tumor, rather than trying to interfere with the proliferation of the cells and, as a result, there are fewer side effects, although there are some. We are seeing some pretty dramatic and rapid responses, and they are occurring in sites where we rarely see responses to chemotherapy, such as in the bone.

“There are some important caveats. All these patients had failed previous therapies, either chemotherapy or treatment with Interleukin 2, as well as surgery. However, we know that only 10-30% of patients will respond to standard chemotherapy, so it’s not surprising that our patients had not responded, or have responded and then the cancer has recurred. In our study 64% of patients have had a partial response, but because we are only treating patients with the BRAF mutation, we are cutting out about 40% of melanoma patients who do not have this mutation and whom we know will not respond to this treatment. That is one reason why we are seeing a much higher response than with conventional treatments.

“Also, we don’t know yet how long these responses will last, and we have had patients whose cancer has progressed after initially responding; so we are putting a lot of effort in to studying the patients who do relapse, trying to understand how their tumors have become resistant.

“In addition, one of the main side effects we’ve seen is that some patients develop early, non-melanoma skin cancers such as squamous cell skin cancer. We are very vigilant about this and although they are very easy to cut out, it’s something we are keeping a close eye on.”

Dr Chapman and his colleagues are planning a phase II trial of 90 patients starting at the end of this year. In addition, a large phase III randomized controlled trial involving several hundred patients is planned to start either at the end of this year or beginning of next year involving centers in North America, Europe and Australia.

Dr Chapman said it was too early to be talking about a cure for advanced melanoma, but that this drug had potential. “Most of us think that a drug like this would ultimately be part of the regimen, but that we might need additional drugs with it to complete the cure. Right now we are seeing dramatic responses but it’s too early to say whether we’ve actually cured people because most patients still have evidence of some level of tumor on their skin. I think this is a huge step forward; whether or not it will be sufficient by itself really remains to be seen.”

Clinical trials to support a registration program for product approval are targeted to start shortly. Plexxikon Inc and Roche are co-developing PLX4032 under their 2006 license and collaboration agreement.

For more information:

Also read these PubMed abstracts:

Images courtesy American Society of Clinical oncology (ASCO).

Sunday, July 12, 2009

Pemetrexed First Agent Approved in Europe as Maintenance Therapy for Advanced, Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The European Medicines Agency’s (EMEA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) has granted approval for the use of pemetrexed for injection (Alimta ®, Eli Lilly and Company) as monotherapy for maintenance treatment of patients with other than predominantly squamous cell histology in locally-advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whose disease has not progressed immediately following platinum-based chemotherapy. This approval is based on data that showed pemetrexed improved overall survival in other than predominantly squamous NSCLC patients in the maintenance setting.

Globally, lung cancer is the most common form of cancer and the biggest killer, causing 1.3 million cancer deaths annually. This is more than breast, colon and prostate cancer taken together. About 85 - 90 percent of all lung cancers are non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Survival rates are very poor.

Major disease forms
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is defined as a group of histologies, that is, tumor types differentiated by cellular structure. The most predominant is squamous cell carcinoma (also known as epidermoid carcinoma) which accounts for 30 - 40% of all NSCLC cases. Formed from round cells that replace damaged cells along the epithelium of the main, lobar or segmental bronchi, this disease is a relatively slow growing carcinoma with a relatively good prognosis. Recurrence rates for resected squamous cell carcinoma are relatively low compared top other types of NSCLC, with distant metastases less common given the same treatment at the same stage.

Also referred to as nonsquamous histology, adenocarcinoma, which account for more than half of all NSCLC diagnoses, usually arises from mucus-producing cells of the lung. Aproximately two-thirds of adenocarcinomas develop in the outer regions of the lung, while the remaining one-third develop centrally. The majority of adenocarcinomas are asymptomatic until they have progressed to an advanced stage. As a consequence, the prognosis is generally worse compared to that of squamous cell carcinoma. On the other hand, once diagnosed, adenocarcinomas generally respond better to treatment than other NSCLC histologies.

Squamous cell carcinoma tends to metastasize in the bone, adrenal glands, liver, small intestines and brain. Because this disease is almost always caused by smoking, occurrence has decreased over the past 30 - 35 years.

Other types of NSCLC include bronchoalveolar carcinoma (BAC), a subclassification of adenocarcinoma with distinct clinical and pathologic properties and large cell carcinoma.

The majority of patients with NSCLC eventually develop metastatic disease or disease that is not a candidate for surgical interventions. this makes them potential candidates for systemic therapies. However, the decision on whether a patient receives therapy, greatly depends upon a number of factors, including the disease stage. In general, the more advanced the disease is, the more likely that a physician will prescribe a drug therapy.

Staging of Lung Cancer
Lung Cancer is often classified according to the American Joint Commitee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system, and has five-tier staging, starting at 0 and rising to the severity of stage IV.

The primary T1 tumor, generally smaller than 3 centimeter, is usually easy to define on computed tomography (CT) and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET).

TNM stage T3 tumors include tumors of any size with direct extension into the chest wall, diaphragm, mediastinal pleura or pericardium. Stage T4 tumors invade the mediastinum, great vessels, trachea, oesophagus and vertebral bodies.

Lung cancer in metastatic stage becomes aggressive. In this stage a therapy to shrink tumour size, stabilize the disease and relieve debilitating symptoms, with minimal toxic effects of the drug is required. Pemetrexed is the most promising molecule in that aspect. The drug provides better survival, progression free time and response and has superior tolerability than other cytotoxic drugs used for the same condition.

Mechanism of action
Pemetrexed is a multitargeted antifolate currently approved for first-line treatment of advanced, other than predominantly squamous NSCLC in combination with a platinum-based chemotherapy, and as a single agent in the second-line setting for advanced, other than predominantly squamous NSCLC patients with recurrent disease. Pemetrexed is chemically similar to folic acid and is in the class ofchenotheray drugs called folate antimetabolites. It works by inhibiting three enzymes used in purine and pyrimidine synthesis—thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), and glycinamide ribonucleotide formyl transferase (GARFT).

Improve Overall Survival in a Maintenance Setting
The concept of maintenance therapy represents a paradigm shift in the treatment of advanced, other than predominantly squamous NSCLC.
Traditionally, patients who respond to first-line chemotherapy are monitored until the disease recurs and are then treated with a second-line regimen. In maintenance therapy, rather than halting further treatment until disease progression, patients who respond to a first-line therapy are treated immediately with a maintenance regimen.

"The idea behind ALIMTA as maintenance therapy for nonsquamous, non-small cell lung cancer is to treat patients immediately following their initial course of therapy, in an effort to prolong survival," said Richard Gaynor, M.D., vice president, cancer research and global oncology platform leader at Lilly. "The study that led to this approval was the first that showed improved overall survival in the maintenance setting for NSCLC. This was also the third trial to show the benefit of tailoring ALIMTA treatment to the nonsquamous NSCLC patient population."

Overall survival data for pemetrexed as a maintenance therapy for NSCLC was presented on May 31, 2009, at the 45th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) by Chandra P Belani M.D.

The trial compared efficacy with respect to overall survival of pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care in 663 patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC whose disease had not progressed after four cycles of platinum-based induction chemotherapy. Pemetrexed was not included among the induction regimens studied in the maintenance trial. The trial supported two previous studies looking at the use of histology to tailor treatment for patients with advanced, other than predominantly squamous NSCLC.

Patients in the trial were treated with pemetrexed (500 mg/m2 on day one of each 21-day cycle) plus best supportive care or placebo plus best supportive care. All patients were supplemented with vitamin B12, folic acid and dexamethasone.

Pemetrexed was initially approved by the FDA in 2004 for the treatment of mesothelioma, with subsequent approval for second-line treatment of NSCLC.

This latest approval for pemetrexed - the fourth in Europe - follows an initial positive opinion issued by the European Medicines Agency's (EMEA) Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) on May 29, 2009, and the recent approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of pemetrexed for maintenance therapy in advanced, nonsquamous NSCLC patients whose disease has not progressed after four cycles of platinum-based first-line chemotherapy.

Apart from the existing approvals in the EU and U.S. for the use of pemetrexed in the treatment of patients with locally-advanced or metastatic other than predominantly squamous NSCLC, pemetrexed is also approved, in combination with cisplatin, in both the EU and U.S. for the treatment of chemotherapy naive patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma.

For more information:
Also read these PubMed abstracts:

How to help your patients:

  • Encourage your patients to have an open, honest talk with you. Tell them that they should feel free to ask any question that’s on their mind, no matter how small it might seem. Also, encourage your patients to talk to other healthcare professionals, including nurses, social workers, and other members of the healthcare team.
Patient resources:

Images courtesy American Society of Clinical oncology (ASCO)

Saturday, May 30, 2009

Surgical Removal of the Primary Tumor Not Immediately Needed in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

New research shows that patients who are newly diagnosed with metastatic, surgically incurable, colorectal cancer (mCRC) do not need immediate surgery to remove their primary tumor unless the tumor is causing complications.

Surgical removal of the primary tumor at the time of diagnosis was once standard practice and is still common in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Because cancer has already spread to other parts of the body by this stage, the purpose of this surgery is not to extend survival, but to prevent future complications, such as intestinal blockage, perforation of the bowel, and severe bleeding. However, over the past decade several new effective chemotherapy drugs for colorectal cancer have been introduced and until now there has been little data to assess whether this pre-emptive surgery is still warranted.

The research will be presented on Monday, June 1, by Philip B. Paty, MD, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, during the 45th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) being held from May 27 – June 2, 2009 in Orlando, Florida.

Incidence of metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC)
According to GLOBOCAN 2002, a cancer incidence database produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization (WHO), the worldwide incidence of colorectal cancer is approximately one million cases per year. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) reports that approximately 50 percent of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer will suffer from advanced disease that has metastasized to other parts of the body, most commonly to the liver.

Uncertain benefit
The researchers rationale is that in the absence of symptoms (bleeding, perforation, obstruction) or resectable metastatic disease, primary tumor resection in patients who present with synchronous metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is of uncertain benefit.

The purpose of their study was to describe the frequency of intervention necessary to palliate the intact primary tumor in patients who present with synchronous stage IV CRC and receive up-front modern combination chemotherapy without prophylactic surgery.

“In this era of modern chemotherapy, routine surgery to remove the primary tumor in patients with unresectable metastases is no longer supported by the data,” explained Philip Paty, MD, an attending surgeon and vice chairman of clinical research at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and the study’s senior author. “In addition to being an unnecessary procedure that carries its own risks of morbidity and mortality, surgery delays the start of chemotherapy for several weeks, and in some cases may make the patient less fit for and less tolerant of chemotherapy. Unless there is an immediate need for surgery, patients should begin chemotherapy first.”

FOLFOX, IFL and FOLFIRI
This retrospective study identified 233 consecutive patients who presented with metastatic colorectal cancer between 2000 and 2006, and were treated with chemotherapy at MSKCC, but had no serious symptoms to prompt immediate surgery. The patients received one of three triple-drug chemotherapy combinations as their initial treatment (the regimens known as FOLFOX, IFL, and FOLFIRI).

Some were also treated with the targeted therapy bevacizumab (Avastin, Roche).

Investigators determined that 217 (93%) patients never developed complications that required removal of their tumor. For the 16 patients (7%) who did eventually need surgery, the vast majority (14/16) had successful operations.

10 patients (4%) required nonoperative intervention (stent or radiotherapy), whereas 213 (89%) never required any direct symptomatic management for their intact primary. Of those, 47 (20%) ultimately underwent elective colon resection at the time of metastasectomy and 8 (3%) during laparotomy for hepatic artery infusion pump placement. Neither use of bevacizumab, location of the primary tumor in the rectum, or metastatic disease burden was associated with increased intervention rate. In addition, when included as a time-varying covariate in a Cox regression model, the need for emergent intervention did not correlate with overall survival.

Most patients with synchronous stage IV CRC who receive up-front modern combination chemotherapy never required palliative surgery for their intact primary. The data support the use of chemotherapy, without routine prophylactic resection, as the appropriate standard practice for patients with neither obstructed nor hemorrhaging primary colorectal tumors in the setting of metastatic disease.

Overall, the researchers concluded that the mortality attributable to surgery was very low (0.8 percent), suggesting that this approach, by avoiding unnecessary surgery, improves the overall safety of treatment.

For more information:


PubMed abstracts:

Other ASCO 2009 abstracts:

Illustration courtesy of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.


Friday, January 30, 2009

Study shows a Survival Benefit with Cancer Vaccine in Glioma.

Data from a Phase I investigator-sponsored trial of the investigational cancer vaccine vitespen (Oncophage®, Antigenics Inc, 3 Forbes Rd, Lexington, MA 02421), an investigational patient-specific vaccine designed to treat cancer with the intent of minimizing adverse events of toxicities in recurrent, high-grade glioma, showed a considerable survival advantage for patients with this disease.

Vaccination with the new cancer vaccine following brain cancer surgery increased overall median survival to approximately 10.5 months with four patients surviving beyond 12 months and one patient surviving almost 2.5 years. This is compared to a historical median survival of only 6.5 months post surgery. All patients enrolled into the trial had at least one recurrence of brain cancer.

The trial was conducted at the Brain Tumor Research Center at the University of California, San Francisco, CA, a center which is internationally recognized as a major research and treatment center for adults and children with tumors of the brain and spinal cord. The data was presented in November 2008 during the Society for Neuro-Oncology’s 13th Annual Scientific Meeting in Las Vegas.

‘These are the most challenging patients to treat because their survival is typically three to six months,’ explained Andrew T. Parsa, MD, PhD, associate professor in the department of neurological surgery at the University of California, San Francisco. ‘These preliminary results suggest a possible impact on survival as well as a very favorable safety profile.’

In addition to survival data, the study also observed a correlation between immune response and overall survival as a result of vaccination with vitespen (n=12; P < .001). These responses were validated by using three separate immune techniques and showed that vitespen evoked a tumor-specific immune response by producing activated T-cells and natural killer cells that can destroy tumor cells. ‘Gliomas develop built-in immunoresistant pathways which play an important role in tumor progression,’ Parsa explained. ‘This study demonstrated significant tumor-specific immune responses leading to a proliferation of T-cells which did not exist in these patients before vaccination with Oncophage. We look forward to completing the Phase II portion of this study and presenting results next year.’

Study Design and Findings
This investigator-sponsored Phase I/II study was designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety and activity of vaccination with vitespen in patients with recurrent, high-grade glioma. Patients were monitored for immune response before and after vitespen treatment using three different techniques.

According to investigators, no adverse events or toxicities identified were considered attributable to the vaccine. A tumor-specific immune response was detected after vaccination in all 12 patients.

Current Regulatory Status
Vitespen is approved in Russia for the adjuvant treatment of kidney cancer patients at intermediate risk for disease recurrence. Outside Russia, vitespen is being evaluated in clinical trials. The drug has been granted fast track and orphan drug status from multiple regulatory bodies, including the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency (EMEA), for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma and metastatic melanoma.

Glioma
Gliomas are the most common type of brain tumor and is currently a fatal disease impairing areas such as thinking, personality and movement. The National Cancer Institute estimates that about 19,000 cases are diagnosed every year in the U.S and according to historical estimates, the median survival of patients with previously treated glioma is typically three to six months.
The outlook for patients with gliomas is generally poor. The median survival for patients with moderately severe or grade III gliomas is 3 - 5 years. The median survival for patients with grade IV glioma, the most severe and aggressive form of the disease also called glioblastoma multiforme, is less than a year.

Personalized medicine
Vitespen offers a unique, personalized, opportunity for the treatment of individual patients.
Derived from each individual’s tumor, the vaccine consists of purified complexes of tumor-derived HSPs linked to tumor antigen peptides which consists the ‘antigenic fingerprint’ of the patient’s particular cancer. This ‘antigenic fingerprint’ is designed to reprogram the body’s immune system to target only cancer cells bearing this specific fingerprint.

When these purified complexes are re-administered to a patient antigenic tumor peptides are expressed on the surface of potent antigen-presenting cells of the immune system, such as macrophages and dendritic cells. This stimulates a more powerful anti-tumor immune response than that generated by expression of the same antigens by the tumor cell. The result is that activated T-cells directly target and destroy cancer cells bearing the specific ‘fingerprint’.

Vitespen is designed to target only cancerous cells and to leave healthy tissue unaffected. As a result, vaccination with this cancer drug limits the toxicities and debilitating side effects typically associated with traditional cancer treatments such as broad-acting cancer chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

Mode of Action
Heat-shock proteins (HSPs) also called stress proteins, are the most abundant and ubiquitous soluble intracellular proteins. They are present in all cells in all life forms and induced when a cell undergoes various types of environmental stresses like heat, cold and oxygen deprivation.
Despite the obvious importance of stress responses, heat shock proteins have only recently been examined for the role they play in the control of disease pathology and in the survival and virulence of pathogens. For example, research has shown that a number of heath shock proteins protect against oxidative damage, conveys peptide antigens for presentation to the immune system, and can protect against cardiac failure.

Various forms of heat shock proteins are involved in binding and stabilizing proteins at intermediate stages of folding (essential for protein function), assembly and translocation and degradation. They interact with antigen-presenting cells (APCs) through CD91 and other receptors, eliciting a cascade of events that includes representation of HSP-chaperoned peptides MHC, translocation of NF-kappaB into the nuclei, and maturation of dendritic cells. The key role heath shock proteins play in fundamental immunologic phenomena allow them to be used for immunotherapy of cancers and infections in new and exciting ways.

For more information, read Pubmed abstracts:

Also see

Information for physicians:

  • Clinical trials: Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors
    ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00293423

Information for your patients: